tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092878.post114854028975974583..comments2010-07-29T18:43:20.965+05:30Suddhasheel Bharatiya GHOSHhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06802349879359586561noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092878.post-1149163993440872832006-06-01T17:43:00.000+05:302006-06-01T17:43:00.000+05:30well written, but not fully well-conceived.<BR/>"i will try to reason it out" - where is the reason? what was the pt you arrived at in the whole para?<BR/><BR/>1. birds of a feather flock together -- so ghetto is okay.<BR/><BR/>2.we bengalis practice adda and discuss a lot--with or without sufficient knowledge. <BR/>so what about it? if the adda is for bengalis only, then the point is surely not *discussing intellectual stuff*, its *discussing in bengali*. because if they let other interested people join their group by discussing in hindi or english (if they hate hindi), then surely the group will have a higher probability of having a nicer discussion.<BR/><BR/>3.the incident abt the resident-bengali gentleman. what was the point you tried to make there?<BR/><BR/>4.it forms reason enough to be ignorant about other people and form a group -- there can be a group without being ignorant about other people. or being exclusive.<BR/><BR/>5.forced to adapt to the language -- okay, one might end up learning bengali which sure is a good thing...but does that practice make sense to you? (because in the end you yourself say, that you have been taught to talk in hindi while with non-bengali ppl).<BR/><BR/>So, apart from the fact tht it was a candid gesture to write this, i failed to detect any conclusion in the whole post. <BR/><BR/>expecting an explanation and some more good posts!Charuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17795714708566527267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092878.post-1148661313455235252006-05-26T22:05:00.000+05:302006-05-26T22:05:00.000+05:30Dear Ghosh,<BR/>Great post.Rahulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08217826764689621603noreply@blogger.com